BCE to buy U.S. internet provider Ziply for $5B, in part with funds from MLSE sale


BCE has signed a deal to buy U.S. fibre internet provider Ziply Fiber for about $5 billion in cash, a move that comes after the high-profile sale of the company’s stake in Maple Leaf Sports & Entertainment earlier this fall. 

BCE said it will help pay for the deal by using about $4.2 billion in net proceeds from selling its stake in MLSE, which owns the Toronto Maple Leafs and the Toronto Raptors.

In September, BCE announced it would sell its 37.5 per cent stake in the sports conglomerate to rival Rogers Communications for $4.7 billion. That transaction is expected to close in mid-2025.

Acquiring Ziply Fiber will extend Bell’s fibre footprint to the United States, BCE said Monday, adding approximately 1.3 million fibre locations.   

“We’re trading our stake in a sports asset … and we’re reallocating capital into a fibre asset with significant growth opportunity, which is straight down the middle of our wheelhouse,” said BCE chief financial officer Curtis Millen.   

In addition to the purchase price, BCE will assume about $2 billion in net debt as part of the transaction. The acquisition is expected to close in the second half of 2025, subject to customary closing conditions and regulatory approvals.     

BCE chief executive Mirko Bibic called the U.S. a “natural expansion market” for the company, and said the transaction “cements Bell’s position as the third-largest fibre network and internet service provider in North America.”

Pedestrians walk past the Maple Leaf Sports & Entertainment offices in Toronto in March 2011. BCE sold its stake in MLSE earlier this fall to Rogers. (Darren Calabrese/The Canadian Press)

“The acquisition represents a highly attractive U.S. market entry point for BCE, and it’s one that’s well aligned with our fibre-first strategy and core competencies,” he said on a conference call with analysts.

Based in Kirkland, Wash., Ziply Fiber offers fibre internet service in the U.S. Pacific Northwest, including Washington, Oregon, Idaho and Montana.

“This acquisition enhances our growth strategy with the scale and experience of one of North America’s leading fibre operators,” Ziply Fiber chief executive Harold Zeitz said in a news release.  

Once the deal has closed, Ziply Fiber is expected to operate as a separate business unit and will continue to be headquartered in Kirkland.

Shares drop, analysts puzzled

BCE’s share price took a hit on Monday after the company announced the deal, closing at $40.47, down $4.34 or around 9.7 per cent.

Scotiabank analyst Maher Yaghi called the move “perplexing” for BCE, noting the costs to load customers — along with capital expenses — are high for fibre operators in the U.S.

“Investors in Canadian telecom are in the sector for dividends and not in it to get growth; they can get it elsewhere,” Yaghi said in a note.

He compared the transaction with Verizon’s announcement in September that it would acquire fibre internet provider Frontier Communications in a $20-billion US deal.

Verizon said at the time that the deal would add 2.2 million fibre subscribers and extend its network reach to 25 million premises across 31 states and Washington, D.C.

“We certainly understand the impetus by Verizon to acquire Frontier given the geographic overlap on wireless but are having a hard time seeing the same potential synergistic potential with BCE’s move at this time,” Yaghi said. 

Desjardins analyst Jerome Dubreuil said the transaction involves “what appears to be a high-quality asset,” with BCE likely motivated by the need to boost telecom growth long term. But he added that the move likely sends a “negative signal” when it comes to Canadian telecom prospects, as BCE and its two largest competitors, Rogers and Telus, have directed “a large portion of recent investments away from the sector.”

BCE has previously outlined its intention to cut spending on its fibre network build in Canada. The company said last year it would reduce its network spend by $1.1 billion in 2024 and 2025. That came in response to the CRTC’s mandate for large telephone companies that own fibre internet networks to give competitors access to their networks for a fee.

Bell has said that direction diminished the business case for it to invest in its domestic network.



Source link

Leave a Reply